AI use cases for regulated production.

Every scenario follows the same four steps: context, problem, how a tool could help, and what people decide. Read them as starting points for a first conversation, not as a catalogue of finished products.

• Explore our solutions
• See how we work

Relevant for

Any production line

Context

A line restarts after a stop, a cleaning cycle, or a change of format, product, or pack size.

Problem

The steps are spread across work instructions, equipment manuals, and line records, and they change with each product and format. Each shift may apply them differently.

How a tool could help

Gather the instructions that apply to that line and format, prepare a step-by-step checklist that cites the source of each point, and show what changed since the previous version.

What people decide

Operators and line leads carry out and sign off each step; the authorized person decides whether the line restarts.

Relevant for

Any production line

Context

An alarm stops a machine or the whole line, and the team needs to understand it quickly and safely.

Problem

Alarm texts are terse, possible causes are documented across several manuals and past interventions, and much of the know-how sits with a few experienced people.

How a tool could help

Bring together the alarm description, documented causes, earlier interventions on the same equipment, and the checks the procedures require, each linked to its source.

What people decide

Engineering and production decide the diagnosis, the intervention, and whether the line can resume. The tool does not act on the equipment.

Relevant for

Any production line

Context

Planned and corrective maintenance on equipment with long manuals, several revisions, and documentation from different suppliers.

Problem

Technicians spend time locating the right procedure, spare-part reference, or earlier fix, especially on equipment they use less often.

How a tool could help

Answer maintenance questions from manuals, procedures, and work-order history, surface similar earlier interventions, and help draft the work-order notes.

What people decide

The maintenance team chooses the intervention and approves the record; any change to the equipment follows the site's change process.

Relevant for

Any production line

Context

Equipment documentation comes from several suppliers, in different languages and formats, and changes over the life of the line.

Problem

Finding the current section, comparing revisions, or checking whether a manual and an internal procedure agree means searching by hand.

How a tool could help

Search manuals, specifications, and procedures across languages, show matching passages side by side, and flag differences between revisions.

What people decide

Document owners decide which revision applies and approve any change to controlled documents.

Relevant for

Pharma and biotech · Medical devices · Food and beverage · Chemicals

Context

An unexpected event in production or testing is recorded as a deviation and may lead to corrective and preventive actions (CAPA) under the quality system.

Problem

The investigation needs production records, procedures, earlier deviations, and equipment history that are often spread across systems and sites.

How a tool could help

Find similar earlier deviations and the actions taken, gather the relevant procedure sections, and prepare a structured investigation draft for the team to complete.

What people decide

Quality decides the root cause, the impact assessment, the CAPA, and the closure. The tool proposes material to review; it does not classify or approve.

• See the pharmaceutical context

Relevant for

Pharma and biotech · Medical devices · Equipment suppliers

Context

A user requirement, a specification, or a supplier document has to be checked against the existing technical record.

Problem

Comparing long documents line by line is slow, and gaps or contradictions are easy to miss.

How a tool could help

Map each requirement to the passages that address it, highlight what is missing or inconsistent, and prepare a traceable comparison for review.

What people decide

Engineering and quality assess each gap and decide what is accepted, changed, or escalated.

Relevant for

Any production line

Context

New operators, shift rotations, and new equipment or formats all require people to learn procedures quickly.

Problem

Training material drifts away from the current procedures, and experienced staff have little time to answer the same questions again and again.

How a tool could help

Answer operators' questions from approved procedures and work instructions in their own language, and help trainers prepare summaries and check questions from the current version.

What people decide

Trainers and supervisors decide when someone is ready for a task. The tool does not assess people or replace the training record.

Relevant for

Equipment suppliers · Service organizations

Context

Service teams support installed equipment at sites in several countries and languages.

Problem

A question arrives in one language while the manuals, service bulletins, and earlier cases are in another, and the answer depends on the exact machine version.

How a tool could help

Find relevant passages in any available language, prepare a draft reply in the language of the request, and keep the sources and machine version visible.

What people decide

A service engineer checks and sends every reply and decides when a site visit or escalation is needed.

Relevant for

Multi-site operations · Project teams

Context

A process, a product, or a line moves between sites, or from project and engineering teams into operations.

Problem

Decisions and the reasons behind them live in project notes, emails, and personal experience, and get lost at the handover.

How a tool could help

Organize approved project material, recurring questions, and earlier decisions so the receiving team can find what was decided, where, and why.

What people decide

The sending and receiving teams decide what is approved for transfer and who owns each topic afterwards.